ModulesModule 2

Turn Alignment into Connected Commitments

Chapter 2: Alignment Is Not Execution.

The book is out in early 2027. The lesson below carries the chapter, so you can start now.

Start the 8-minute lessonJump to the tools8 minute lesson, 60 minute session
  1. 1ReadThe lesson, about 8 minutes.
  2. 2UseThe 4 tools, on one real situation.
  3. 3MeetA 60-minute working session with your team.
  4. 4Mark it heldThe module is done when the session happens.

In short

Module 2 of the free Heroes Don't Scale course, by Russ Reeder, turns Chapter 2, Alignment Is Not Execution, into work. Expose the different operating choices hiding under shared words.

Objectives

  • Expose the different operating choices hiding under shared words.
  • Settle one real resource conflict with the person who controls the capital, in writing, and record which commitment changes.
  • Connect each function's contribution to the priority so the plan is one people can deliver, not better wording alone.

Lesson

About 8 minutes to read

The scene

Early 2006. NxTV delivered digital entertainment to premium hotels, and the paid in-room movie business was under pressure. Investors brought me in to grow the company and deliver an exit, and the team and I agreed on the answer: more hotels. Then one weekend in Redondo Beach, with two babies in the house and a new Fios line, something clicked. What if we could treat every home like another hotel room? I took one of our set-top boxes home, worked with the engineering team, and by the end of the weekend we were sending encrypted content over the internet to the box in my living room, before Netflix launched streaming. Then things started to stall.

The mechanism

The management team was aligned on the vision. The controlling shareholder, a real estate investor who knew the hotel business, kept using his own channel to push for more hotels. The CFO, a co-founder with close ties to the leadership I had replaced, took concerns about the new direction to him, so the old channels kept operating. Growth meant more hotel contracts to him and a new market to us, and we had never agreed on what to prioritize, what to fund, or how much time we had. In August 2007 we reached a serious point with Comcast. The controlling shareholder wanted a higher valuation. Comcast declined and walked away, and the company now had to prove that valuation through execution with more capital than it had. Part of that is on me. Six months in, I had called the management team aligned. I never turned that alignment into a funding and priority agreement, in writing, with the people who controlled the capital. A CEO cannot execute a strategy the owners have not agreed to fund. The digital distribution strategy was never fully funded or executed, and the owners sold the business in 2011.

The second scene

GoDaddy, Scottsdale, Arizona, the first strategic leadership team meeting after the Media Temple acquisition, about 80 people in the room. Blake Irving had been CEO for less than a year. He delivered the vision, and it was strong. The execution plan that connects the direction to each manager's work wasn't there yet. Everyone left that meeting and went right back to work. People defaulted to familiar work because no one had given them the tools to turn the strategy into their own priorities. I worked with the head of HR, Auguste Goldman, and the other HR executives to build a training program. Then two HR executives and I traveled to every GoDaddy office and trained over 600 managers on how their own goals connected to Blake's vision. What I could see was managers setting goals that connected upward to the vision. I can't separate the program's effect on business performance from everything else happening at GoDaddy. A sincere vision speech changes nothing until the local scoreboards change.

The third scene

Nokia saw parts of the smartphone future early. Symbian was the foundation of its smartphone business, MeeGo was in development, and after choosing Windows Phone in February 2011 it still had to support Symbian, manage MeeGo, and build Lumia. Researchers Quy Huy and Timo Vuori, drawing on 76 interviews, found that fear shaped how information moved inside Nokia: some middle managers passed optimistic, filtered information upward. A ranked plan cannot help if the facts used to rank it are softened before they reach the people making the decision. Parallel bets are useful when each has a purpose, a resource limit, and a point at which leaders compare the evidence and choose. They become a problem when teams compete for the same people and funding without a shared decision rule.

The tool

Ask every senior leader to finish one sentence independently: this strategy means my team will start X, stop Y, and prioritize Z. Compare the answers before anyone negotiates common wording. Then write the direction on one page with Vision and Priorities, settle one resource conflict in the Priority Stack with the authorized resource owner, put the displaced work on the No List, and use the Alignment Translation Worksheet so each function names what changes in its work.

From your seat

If you control the capital or sit with the people who do, put the priority and funding choice in writing before calling the team aligned: which business you will protect, which opportunity you will build, how much each receives, and what evidence will justify continuing or changing course. If you manage a team, take your own start, stop, and prioritize sentence to your manager. If you are carrying a priority nobody has funded or named, say so before it becomes a missed promise. If you lead, examine what happens to the person who brings you an unwelcome date. If you are the manager holding the unwelcome facts, put them in the open.

The line

A working demo shows what is possible. It doesn't make a company.

Tools

Module 2: Turn Alignment into Connected Commitments. From the free course toolkit for Heroes Don't Scale.

Vision and Priorities

Worksheet
  • The result we are building toward
  • The customer or stakeholder who benefits
  • The planning period
  • Three ranked priorities
  • The outcome each priority supports
  • What we will not fund or pursue during this period

Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________

Priority Stack

Worksheet

The ranked list, not a second strategy document. When priorities need the same people or money, have the authorized resource owner confirm which wins and which commitment changes. Put displaced work on the No List; Module 6 holds its fields. An unfunded choice is unresolved, however the schedule looks.

  • Priorities, ranked
  • People or money they share
  • Authorized resource owner
  • Which priority wins
  • Commitment that changes
  • Displaced work, moved to the No List
  • Funding confirmed

Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________

Definition Audit

Worksheet
  • Term people use
  • Meaning in each function
  • Example of acceptable evidence
  • Example that does not qualify
  • Shared definition
  • Person responsible for keeping it current

Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________

Alignment Translation Worksheet

Worksheet

Have each function explain the decisions and commitments that change, using input from the people who will deliver them. Leaders set the result, constraints, and standards; the owner chooses the method within those boundaries. Agreement on the sentence is the beginning. Agreement on the tradeoff is the test.

  • Company priority
  • Function's contribution
  • Measurable outcome
  • Work to stop
  • Decisions the function can make
  • Dependencies on other functions
  • First review date

Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________

Working Session

60 minutes

Expose different interpretations of the same strategy and settle one real resource conflict. The result is a plan people can deliver, not better wording alone.

People
The relevant functional leaders, the person authorized to allocate the disputed capital or capacity, and owners of the critical handoff.
Bring
Independent start, stop, and prioritize statements, a draft Vision and Priorities page, current budgets, available capacity, existing promises, and input from the employees who will deliver the work.
  1. 10min

    Where do our answers imply different choices?

    Compare the independent statements before negotiating common language. Use the Definition Audit only for terms blocking this decision.

  2. 10min

    Which commitments compete for the same capacity?

    Name the constrained people or money and the evidence for their priority order.

  3. 15min

    Which commitment wins now?

    Have the authorized resource owner confirm the allocation in the Priority Stack. Name the work to pause, reduce, or stop and the date it changes.

  4. 15min

    What must each function deliver?

    Record the contribution, owner, next commitment, dependency, and due date. Have the receiving function confirm the handoff.

  5. 10min

    What will cause us to change the plan?

    Choose the evidence and first review date. Make it safe to report a capacity shortfall before it becomes a missed promise.

Leave with
The different choices the independent statements exposed, and one authorized priority choice with connected commitments, in the VOOCS Operating Record (the one-page record from Module 5 that every session writes into). The Priority Stack ranks it; the No List records displaced work; the Alignment Translation Worksheet connects the functions.
Next check
At the next review, verify that budgets, assignments, and displaced work changed. Inspect the first handoff with its receiving owner.
If the work still stalls
Every initiative keeps its old deadline, the capital decision is still open, or nobody receiving a dependency has accepted it. Matching slides do not resolve that conflict.

Session kit: tools from other modules

Session 2 uses these tools from other modules. They are here so you can run the session from this page. Print worksheet prints them with the session.

From Module 5: Build the Operating Loop and Transfer Judgment

VOOCS Operating Record

Worksheet

Copy this record for one initiative. Use role titles while designing the plan, then name the actual people before making a live commitment. Link to detail only where it supports a decision. Leave irrelevant fields out. If an answer is unknown, or the owner and sponsor give different answers, name who will resolve it and by when. Start with one recurring problem so the team can test the whole arrangement before expanding it; the book's illustrative locked-accounts record in Chapter 5 shows one filled in.

Header fields:

  • Initiative
  • Outcome owner
  • Sponsor
  • Date and next review
  • Facilitator and recorder

Vision: What result are we building toward, and who benefits? Why does it matter now? Which priority does it serve? What are we choosing not to do?

Outcomes: What is the baseline, target, and due date? Which quality or risk conditions must hold? What evidence will show the result, and who will verify it?

Ownership: Who owns the outcome? Which decisions and resources can they control? What do dependency owners commit to deliver, and who resolves it when their other priorities compete with this work? What is reserved for someone else, and how quickly must that person respond?

Cadence: When will we review the evidence? Who will do what next, by when? Which decision must close before the work can proceed? Where will we record the decision and its result? If a commitment slipped, what condition changes before the new date?

Systems: What repeatable workflow, standards, and controls support the work? Where is the shared source of truth? Who has the access, training, and practice to provide backup? What evidence shows they can carry the work and recognize an exception without waiting for the original hero?

Decision check. Before closing, confirm: decision and reason; authorized owner; next commitment; due date; evidence and receiving person. If a gap remains, record its exact question, decider, evidence owner, and return date.

Module 7 deepens the Outcomes line and Module 8 the Ownership line. Every other tool writes into this same record, and the 90-Day Install follows it.

Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________

From Module 6: Turn a Strategic No into a Change in the Work

No List

Worksheet

Make the No List specific enough to change spending and behavior. Agree on the top priorities, then decide which new requests you will decline and what existing work stops. Stopping work releases capacity the business can reassign; declining a request protects capacity the priority already has, and only released capacity can be moved. If no one in the room can stop the work, record the conflict, its cost to the chosen priority, and the person who can decide, with a date.

  • Work, offer, request, or rewarded behavior stopping or being declined
  • Priority this protects
  • Reason
  • Effective date
  • Owner
  • Funding, people, or capacity released or protected
  • Where and when that capacity will be used or retained
  • Customer and employee commitments to honor
  • Communication owner
  • Conditions that could justify reconsideration

The last field is the evidence test. Write it before the pressure arrives: a changed customer need, different economics, or results that challenge the original assumptions. Pressure is not evidence.

Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________

The Hero Test for this chapter

THE HERO TEST: What changes on monday?

  1. For the person at the top

    Would your leaders finish this sentence the same way: this strategy means my team will start X, stop Y, and prioritize Z?

  2. For the manager in the middle

    What changes in your team’s work on Monday, and which two commitments need the same people?

  3. For the person the company waits on

    Which priority are you quietly carrying that nobody has funded or named, and who else knows?

One action

If the decision is yours, put the priority and funding choice in writing with the people who control the capital before calling the team aligned. If it is not, take your start, stop, and prioritize sentence to your manager.

Evidence of Completion

  • One priority ranked in the Priority Stack and confirmed by the person authorized to allocate the disputed capital or capacity, in the VOOCS Operating Record.
  • The displaced work on the No List with the date it pauses, reduces, or stops.
  • Each function's contribution, owner, next commitment, dependency, and due date on the Alignment Translation Worksheet, confirmed by the receiving function.
  • The evidence that would change the plan, and a dated first review. If the funding authority was not in the room, who takes the open question to them and the date it must close.

Was this module useful?