ModulesModule 7
Decide Whether the Result Is Done
Chapter 7: Done Is a Decision. This module deepens the Outcomes line of the record. Done is a decision grounded in evidence, agreed before the work begins and defined from the customer backward.
The book is out in early 2027. The lesson below carries the chapter, so you can start now.
- 1ReadThe lesson, about 8 minutes.
- 2UseThe 4 tools, on one real situation.
- 3MeetA 60-minute working session with your team.
- 4Mark it heldThe module is done when the session happens.
In short
Module 7 of the free Heroes Don't Scale course, by Russ Reeder, turns Chapter 7, Done Is a Decision, into work. By the end of this module you will be able to separate three things that can each be true or false on their own: the activity happened, the recipient accepted the deliverable, and the business outcome improved.
Objectives
- By the end of this module you will be able to separate three things that can each be true or false on their own: the activity happened, the recipient accepted the deliverable, and the business outcome improved.
- You will have taken one live deliverable to the person who receives it and agreed, before calling it done, on the target, the deadline, the acceptance conditions, and the evidence.
- And you will have paired one lagging result with the forward commitment that can still change it: the next step, the owner, and the date.
Lesson
About 8 minutes to readThe scene
I was sitting in a Netrix sales review on Park Avenue in New York, looking at a dashboard that could not tell me what we had committed to do next week. Over thirty metrics on it. Bookings, revenue, deal status, every opportunity color coded red, green, or yellow. A dashboard is what you look at while you drive. This one told us where the car had been and where it was sitting. It did not tell us what we had to do to move.
Every week the reviews returned to explanations. Someone in marketing did not deliver. Someone in technology is still working on their piece. The prospect went quiet. Much of that context mattered. But we kept ending reviews without an owner, a next step, or a date. A rep carrying 20 active deals and 50 more in the pipeline cannot hold every next step in memory. That is not a lack of desire. It is a gap in practice and process. The dashboard changed when every meaningful opportunity gained three fields: a next customer step, an owner, and a due date. Follow-up moved from a rep's memory to the record. Explanations now led to commitments someone could follow up on.
The mechanism
The same gap at OVH cost us customers. The promise I remember making was direct: don't go to AWS, Azure, or Google. Stay with us, and we'll migrate you to a new data center in three months. Three months passed. Then another three. Then another. The migration process did not end until December 2019. Along the way, internal milestones were closing. Construction progressed while customer migration dates slipped. Every week, the teams reported their activity without showing which customer commitments they had completed. Many customers did not wait. They migrated out, and that result only became visible in the rearview mirror. When OVH's founder took control of the data center builds, the customer commitment stayed with us; control of the work did not. When authority over a dependency changes, reopen the affected commitment immediately. Keeping the old date requires evidence that the new arrangement can still deliver it.
Boeing shows the same gap at a scale where the cost was measured in lives. Lion Air Flight 610 crashed on October 29, 2018. Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed on March 10, 2019. 346 people died. The aircraft had been certified. Safe performance was not assured. The House Transportation Committee report in September 2020 identified production pressure, faulty technical assumptions, withheld information, and failures in FAA oversight. A signoff records an approval. It does not replace the evidence behind that approval. Done is the system outcome demonstrated under the conditions it has to meet. The operating question is who tests the interaction between the parts. When a design or an operating assumption changes, the review has to cover the changed conditions before the approval carries forward. Who can stop release when the evidence does not support it?
Back in our data center, the distinction between components and the whole still applied. We could build racks. We could turn on electricity. If the cooling system was not ready, we could not deliver. Component completion was not enough. Done meant a service the customer could use at the promised level.
The tool
Four views of one review, not four meetings. The Done Test defines completion from the customer backward. The Forward Commitment Dashboard pairs the lagging result with the next observable commitment. The Outcome Closure Agenda runs every review. The System Outcome Verification Gate tests the seams, where a result can fail between departments. For example, a sales review might record that the account lead and sales engineer will demonstrate the customer's agreed recovery scenario on Thursday. Done means the customer's technical owner confirms that the test met the agreed requirements and records any gaps. Sending the invitation or finishing the demonstration does not provide that evidence.
From your seat
If you run the review, start with the commitment already in the record: what happened, what evidence establishes completion, and what remains for the customer to decide. End it with a next step, an owner, a date, and the evidence that will establish completion on every material item, and name who accepts that evidence. Keep activity, acceptance, and outcome visible as three separate things. If you manage a team that calls work done, ask what the customer can now do and who besides the builders says so. If you are the person whose head holds the next step on every deal or project, write those details beside your own work where a colleague can act, and confirm the acceptance conditions with the person who depends on it. Documentation is not a judgment of your contribution. It is the system that lets the team honor that contribution and keep serving the customer when you are not there.
The line
Done on paper is not done in reality.
Tools
Module 7: Decide Whether the Result Is Done. From the free course toolkit for Heroes Don't Scale.
Done Test (the Customer-Backward Definition of Done)
WorksheetStart with the person who will use the result. When that person is an external customer who cannot attend, the receiving owner stands in, names the evidence the customer would accept, and the sponsor confirms it. Have the owner and recipient agree on what must be true to accept it, operate it, and rely on it, and record the proof, who will obtain it, and when it will be checked. Keep activity, acceptance, and outcome visible as three separate things.
- Deliverable
- Business outcome
- Baseline and target
- Deadline
- Acceptance conditions
- Evidence source
- Accountable owner
- Independent verifier or receiving owner
Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________
Forward Commitment Dashboard
WorksheetBuild it around the next observable commitment, not a color chosen by the team. Pair it with the lagging result so activity cannot substitute for performance. Limit the display to information that changes a decision.
- Outcome
- Latest measured result and date
- Next external commitment or handoff
- Accountable owner
- Due date
- Evidence expected and source
- Decision or dependency that could block it
Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________
Outcome Closure Agenda
Ask these questions at each review: What was promised? What evidence arrived? What remains unmet? What decision is needed now? Who owns the next commitment, and when will it close? When a commitment is missed, diagnose capability, capacity, authority, a bad assumption, or follow-through before assigning blame. The 90-Day Install uses this agenda as the standing agenda for every review.
System Outcome Verification Gate
Ask the receiving function to demonstrate that the result works in its workflow: data, permissions, support, training, exceptions, customer acceptance, and failure recovery. If the scope, acceptance conditions, or deadline must change, obtain agreement from the authorized sponsor and receiving owner and record which original conditions remain unmet. An owner cannot redefine done alone after missing it. Add an independent verifier when the cost of being wrong is severe or a regulator requires it.
Working Session
60 minutesSeparate a completed activity from a deliverable the recipient can use and the business outcome it is meant to produce. Run the four tools as one review, not four meetings.
- People
- The outcome owner, the receiving owner or customer representative, critical dependency owners, the independent verifier required for the risk, and the sponsor when scope, conditions, or deadline may need an authorized change.
- Bring
- One claimed completion or live commitment, the acceptance conditions agreed before the work, dated results, test evidence, and the next external handoff.
- 10
What is being called complete?
Identify the activity, the deliverable, and the business outcome separately. Apply the Done Test. If no conditions were agreed before the work, write and date them now with the recipient instead of backdating them.
- 10
Which conditions are met?
Check each Done Test condition against dated evidence and its source. Leave unmet conditions visible.
- 15
Can the recipient use and rely on it?
Use the System Outcome Verification Gate to examine handoffs, access, support, exceptions, and recovery under the required operating conditions.
- 15
What decision does the evidence require?
Accept, repair, obtain further proof, or request an authorized change. A missed deadline does not let the owner redefine done alone.
- 10
What is the next observable commitment?
Use the Outcome Closure Agenda to name the action, owner, due date, evidence, and blocking decision. Pair it with the latest measured result on the Forward Commitment Dashboard.
- Leave with
- One closure decision with proof and unmet conditions recorded in the VOOCS Operating Record, plus the next entry on the Forward Commitment Dashboard. Keep deliverable acceptance separate from a business outcome that still needs observation.
- Next check
- Compare the next commitment's evidence with the actual result after its agreed observation period. If steps close without customer progress, test the approach and the assumptions.
- If the work still stalls
- A green status replaces proof, a proposal counts as customer progress, or the receiving team cannot use the result. Diagnose capacity, capability, authority, assumptions, and follow-through before assigning blame.
Session kit: tools from other modules
Session 7 uses this tool from other modules. It is here so you can run the session from this page. Print worksheet prints it with the session.
From Module 5: Build the Operating Loop and Transfer Judgment
VOOCS Operating Record
WorksheetCopy this record for one initiative. Use role titles while designing the plan, then name the actual people before making a live commitment. Link to detail only where it supports a decision. Leave irrelevant fields out. If an answer is unknown, or the owner and sponsor give different answers, name who will resolve it and by when. Start with one recurring problem so the team can test the whole arrangement before expanding it; the book's illustrative locked-accounts record in Chapter 5 shows one filled in.
Header fields:
- Initiative
- Outcome owner
- Sponsor
- Date and next review
- Facilitator and recorder
Vision: What result are we building toward, and who benefits? Why does it matter now? Which priority does it serve? What are we choosing not to do?
Outcomes: What is the baseline, target, and due date? Which quality or risk conditions must hold? What evidence will show the result, and who will verify it?
Ownership: Who owns the outcome? Which decisions and resources can they control? What do dependency owners commit to deliver, and who resolves it when their other priorities compete with this work? What is reserved for someone else, and how quickly must that person respond?
Cadence: When will we review the evidence? Who will do what next, by when? Which decision must close before the work can proceed? Where will we record the decision and its result? If a commitment slipped, what condition changes before the new date?
Systems: What repeatable workflow, standards, and controls support the work? Where is the shared source of truth? Who has the access, training, and practice to provide backup? What evidence shows they can carry the work and recognize an exception without waiting for the original hero?
Decision check. Before closing, confirm: decision and reason; authorized owner; next commitment; due date; evidence and receiving person. If a gap remains, record its exact question, decider, evidence owner, and return date.
Module 7 deepens the Outcomes line and Module 8 the Ownership line. Every other tool writes into this same record, and the 90-Day Install follows it.
Initiative: ________________________ Owner: ________________________ Date: ____________
The Hero Test for this chapter
THE HERO TEST: What does done look like?
For the person at the top
Does your dashboard show where the car has been, or what has to happen next, and who owns it by when?
For the manager in the middle
For what your team calls done this month, what can the customer now do, and who besides the builders says so?
For the person the company waits on
Which deal or project stalls next week because its next step, owner, and date live only in your head?
One action
If the decision is yours, end every review with a next step, an owner, a date, and the evidence that will establish completion. Name who accepts that evidence. If it is not, write those details beside your own work and confirm the acceptance conditions with the person who depends on it. In the Chapter 5 example, the trial is complete when the case records show correct resolution and the backup demonstrates the exception handoff.
Evidence of Completion
- One Done Test is agreed with the recipient, with acceptance conditions, evidence source, and the verifier named before the deliverable is called done.
- One closure decision is recorded in the VOOCS Operating Record: accept, repair, obtain further proof, or an authorized change, with the unmet conditions left visible.
- The next entry on the Forward Commitment Dashboard carries the latest measured result, the next external commitment, its owner, its due date, and the evidence expected.
- The observation period for the business outcome is set, and the next review is on the calendar.